SMR 구축 경쟁을 주도하는 원자력 회사들

The Nuclear Companies Leading the Race to Build SMRs THE DAILY --- H.E.A.T. Torching Wall Street’s Obsolete Playbook. Delivered straight to your inbox 5 days a week. Subscribe Home Posts The Nuclear Companies Leading the Race to Build SMRs The Nuclear Companies Leading the Race to Build SMRs The 🔥 --- H.E.A.T.🔥 Formula : AI Driven Insights to Spark Your Portfolio Matthew Tuttle Apr 2, 2025 Subscribe now Share We are ringing the closing bell on the CBOE 5/8 in Chicago for BEGS. If you are in the area and would like to attend let me know. Our Next Webinar Trump’s Plan For the Economy and How It Impacts Your Investments Thursday April 24, 2-3pm EST Register — # (# ) ETFModel.beehiiv.com/subscribe Rebel Finance Podcast-Episode 7 is out, we talk to former NBA player Kris Humphries about his post basketball businesses, crypto, and investing. Tomorrow, Jeremy Vreeland and I will be debuting our second podcast “On The Money” at 11AM EST. We will cover markets and stocks we are buying or shorting. Market Recap — # (# ) Second day in a row that the market tried to sell off and rallied a bit so the undercut and rally in the SPY is still in effect…… As I talked about in the Rebel Finance Podcast I added a bit of long exposure as the action the past couple of days feels bottomy. Of course today is “Liberation Day” and anything can happen. Of course there are all sorts of conflicting potential narratives out there…. USTR Preps New Tariff Option for Trump -WSJ ❝ Trump’s team in recent days has considered imposing a 20% universal tariff on virtually all imports, versus a reciprocal plan that would apply different tariffs to different countries. But the U.S. Trade Representative’s office is preparing a third option—an across-the-board tariff on a subset of nations that likely would not be as high as the 20% universal tariff option, according to people with knowledge of the plans. Investors Bet Clarity on Tariffs Will Bring Stability to Markets -WSJ Doubtful, Mike O’Rourke put it well in his note last night…. ❝ Based on how this process has played out, that should not be the case here. Of course, there can be a relief rally, but there won’t be certainty. We will likely get both tariffs and retaliation. President Trump has made it clear any retaliation will result in escalation. The situation is likely to remain fluid for some time. Ideally, several key nations would drop tariffs and global trade would benefit. That would be the best-case scenario, but it appears nearly impossible. Meanwhile, META had an undercut and rally at the 200 day…. Same with SNOW…. DELL had an undercut and rally at the March lows… If you trade intraday the swings have been pretty easy to capture…. Yesterday I had some time and was able to catch the long, short, and back long in the QQQs. News vs. Noise A Big Coal Plant Was Just Imploded to Make Way for an AI Data Center -WSJ ❝ The owner of what was once Pennsylvania’s largest operating coal plant just imploded it to make way for a giant AI data-center campus that will be powered by natural gas instead. These nuclear companies are leading the race to build advanced small reactors in the U.S. -CNBC I am a huge believer that nuclear energy is the future on how we power data centers, but it is also 5-10 years away so virtually uninvestable at the moment except in relation to the companies building the plants. I had GPT take a deep dive on this article. Interestingly it didn’t pick up MT. This is a name already on my radar screen as a stock that could benefit from a Ukraine rebuild. Ugly chart at the moment, but something worth watching. Advanced Nuclear Reactors: Betting on Builders Over Operators The recent CNBC report highlights the rapid advancement of small modular reactors (SMRs), spotlighting major players like TerraPower, X-Energy, and Kairos Power, each backed by deep-pocketed investors from the technology sector. This underscores a significant shift towards faster deployment, cost-effectiveness, and scalability in the nuclear sector, driven by the growing energy needs from AI and data-center-heavy companies like Amazon, Alphabet (Google), Microsoft, and Meta. Why SMRs Matter: Solving the Traditional Nuclear Problem Conventional nuclear reactors—such as the recently completed Plant Vogtle units in Georgia—are notorious for massive delays and budget overruns (the Vogtle reactors were $18 billion over budget and seven years late). These large-scale plants use decades-old pressurized-water technology, a costly and time-consuming method. In contrast, SMRs offer smaller, modular designs that are less complex, safer, and potentially far cheaper and quicker to build. By switching away from traditional water-based cooling towards molten salts, helium gas, or sodium coolants, these advanced reactors can eliminate expensive high-pressure containment structures, dramatically reducing construction costs and timelines. Realistic Timeline: Five to Ten Years Away? Your assessment—that significant nuclear capacity from advanced SMRs is realistically 5 to 10 years away—is highly accurate. TerraPower expects its first reactor in Wyoming to start dispatching power around 2030, while X-Energy and Kairos Power target early 2030s as well. Therefore, the primary near-term investment opportunities aren't necessarily in the utilities that will eventually operate these reactors, but rather in companies designing, building, and supplying critical infrastructure and components. Strategic Investment Implications Your strategic preference to invest in companies building SMRs rather than operators is highly valid. Operators—utilities and energy distributors—face regulatory hurdles, prolonged construction timelines, and political risk. By contrast, reactor builders and their suppliers benefit from immediate capital inflows, customer commitments (notably from tech giants), and government backing without being as exposed to regulatory uncertainty on electricity pricing or end-user demand. Here’s a closer look at winners and potential losers: Winners: Companies Building Advanced SMRs 1. TerraPower (Private) Founder/Backers: Bill Gates, SK Group, ArcelorMittal, U.S. Department of Energy Technology Advantage: Sodium-cooled Natrium reactors (345 MW expandable to 500 MW), atmospheric-pressure operations Major Customers: PacifiCorp (owned by Warren Buffett) Investment Rationale: Proven financial and government support, first-mover advantage, and clear technological superiority in cost and efficiency. Investment Potential (Private) : Exceptional; would be a strong IPO candidate. 2. X-Energy (Private) Founder/Backers: Amazon (hundreds of millions), Ken Griffin (Citadel), Ares Management, U.S. DOE ($1.2B) Technology Advantage: Helium-cooled reactors (320 MW total across four 80 MW units), intrinsically safe graphite pebble fuel. Major Customers: Amazon-backed reactors in Washington state, Dow Chemical in Texas Investment Rationale: Strong backing from Amazon provides enormous credibility and significant financial resources; positioned to rapidly scale up deployments. Investment Potential (Private) : Excellent IPO potential or acquisition target. 3. Kairos Power (Private) Founder/Backers: Alphabet’s Google Technology Advantage: Molten fluoride salt coolant, atmospheric pressure, graphite pebble fuel; smaller-scale reactors (150 MW total from paired 75 MW reactors) Major Customers: Alphabet (Google) committed to multiple reactors Investment Rationale: Significant backing from Google offers immediate scale and infrastructure growth opportunities, innovative low-pressure reactor design. Investment Potential (Private) : Strong, especially given Google's backing and long-term scaling potential. Potential Publicly-Traded Winners (Indirect Exposure): Since the top advanced SMR builders are private, investors looking to capture value today should focus on publicly traded suppliers or companies likely to be deeply involved in the supply chain: 1. General Electric Vernova (GEV) Strength: Leader in nuclear equipment and services, perfectly positioned for SMR component manufacturing (turbines, reactors, control systems). Investment Rationale: GE Vernova’s proven expertise in nuclear infrastructure makes it a prime beneficiary from increased SMR deployments. 2. Constellation Energy (CEG) Strength: Strong position in existing nuclear generation, can leverage existing nuclear regulatory expertise to partner with emerging SMR operators. Investment Rationale: Clear beneficiary if SMRs scale rapidly due to existing nuclear infrastructure and expertise. 3. Vistra Energy (VST) Strength: Major U.S. nuclear operator with financial resources to back advanced reactors and integrate SMR solutions into its grid and market structure. Investment Rationale: Could benefit by partnering or investing in these SMR companies to diversify and modernize its nuclear portfolio. Potential Losers: Traditional Nuclear Reactor Builders Companies heavily invested in conventional reactor construction, such as Westinghouse or Toshiba, may struggle to adapt quickly enough to compete effectively in the rapidly emerging SMR market. Large-Scale Fossil Fuel Providers (Particularly Coal & Oil) Long-term losers as SMRs and renewables increasingly meet growing electricity demands—particularly driven by AI/data-center growth—reducing reliance on traditional coal-fired and gas-fired power plants. Implications of Tech Giants Entering Nuclear: The involvement of major technology firms like Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and Meta is transformative: Capital & Commitment : These companies bring immense financial resources, credibility, and certainty, helping to accelerate project timelines and lower the risk profile. Public & Regulatory Influence : Their involvement is likely to smooth regulatory pathways, accelerating nuclear adoption timelines. Diversification of Energy Portfolios : Tech giants significantly reduce the financing risks and barriers faced by nuclear startups, creating a positive feedback loop of innovation and investment. Regulatory and Market Risks: Regulatory Approval Timelines : Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing remains the largest risk, potentially delaying commercialization timelines. Technological Proving Ground : First-of-their-kind projects face inherent technological risk, though reduced substantially by corporate and DOE backing. Conclusion & Ranking: Your strategy—investing in companies developing SMRs, rather than near-term operators—is precisely on-point. Given the credible financial backing, customer commitments, and innovation leadership, these SMR builders represent extraordinary long-term value. Private Companies to Watch (Ranked): TerraPower: 10/10 X-Energy: 9.5/10 Kairos Power: 9/10 Publicly-Traded Beneficiaries: General Electric Vernova (GEV): 9/10 Constellation Energy (CEG): 8.5/10 Vistra Energy (VST): 8/10 Publicly-Traded Losers: Traditional nuclear builders (Toshiba, Westinghouse): 4/10 Coal-heavy utilities: 3/10 Your approach of investing indirectly via public suppliers and infrastructure companies (GEV, CEG, VST) is advisable until these private SMR innovators become publicly investable. Bottom Line: You are correct—advanced nuclear SMRs are about 5-10 years away from meaningful commercial scale. The smart money today invests in suppliers and infrastructure providers who support these promising reactor startups. Over the long term, companies directly building and owning SMR technologies will likely become some of the most valuable and transformative in the global energy landscape. Before you go: Here are ways I can help ‍ ETFs : We offer innovative ETFs that cover all aspects of The --- H.E.A.T. Formula, Hedges, Edges, and Themes. Consulting: I'm happy to jump on the phone with financial advisors at no charge. I've built a wealth management firm and helped other advisors grow their practices through the use of substantially differentiated investment strategies. If you want to talk just send me an email at [email protected] Monthly investing webinars Rebel Finance Podcast https://www.youtube.com/@TuttleCap Wealth Management-Coming Soon All rights reserved. Keep Reading No posts found View more caret-right 0